It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I guess I've tried to be as honest as I can about what I think constitutes a good-looking guitar and have tried to leave any brand/model preconceptions at the door.
I said maybe.....
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
I thought a Les Paul with F holes and a Bigsby would be a talking point!
Referring to something @Hattigol mentioned in another thread.
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
I've LOL'd anything I wouldn't want in my home (based on looks alone, not because I'm completely shallow, but because that's all you get from a photo!).
Much of the time I've given neither, reflecting my lack of any strong feeling either way. There seems no point in forcing a choice here, as it won't reflect how I really feel.
So, for example, I've never been interested in Telecasters, except very occasionally, when I've forgotten to take my meds. So most Teles got neither a Lol nor Wow. But what I like about the look of a Tele is the way the scratch plate and controls work with the shape, so anything with a less attractive scratch plate design got a LoL. But then, a couple of Teles actually inspired me to give a Wow. Which make me wonder if I took my meds this morning...