It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
richardhomer said: Split with the original owner?! Just not grounded in reality. Once cash has been handed over, the buyer has no responsibility whatsoever to the original seller. Why should they make their intentions known if they decide to sell it on quickly?
There’s nothing legally fraudulent in this whatsover. The seller ultimately decides the selling price, full stop. If they unwittingly undersell it’s on them, lesson learned. If they are foolish enough to accept less on the back of a sob story from a stranger, it’s also on them (haggling is not illegal). If they consciously decide to accept less for a quicker sale, it’s also their decision. They have no further stake in the item purchased whatsover.
In a slightly different vein, a buyer should hope for the same transparency. I remember buying a Peavey Rockingham from a seller on eBay with a 100% positive rating and described as perfect. When my guitar tech got hold of it, he told me that it was incredible that I'd got a sound out of it, the wiring was that badly lashed up. The seller denied all knowledge, and it wasn't worth the hassle of pursuing it. By that time, I didn't want it and decided to sell it, but wanted it retired first so that some other poison didn't have the problem. Sold it and delivered it to a lovely rockabilly chap in Harrogate. The amusing bit was that, after all that, he didn't actually play guitar but just wanted it for his wall. :-)
My worst “loss” was a masterbuilt tele that I sold to buy an original 66 tele. The masterbuilt was brilliant, the 66 wasn’t. I sold the masterbuilt for £3,250, found it later it went to Greg’s Guitars and he sold it at around £5k. Ouchy
The market is pretty slow at the moment so I'm surprised anyone can be bothered to try make money being a flipper.
I reckon i have "lost" thousands buying and selling here over the last few years and thus have no qualms doing whatever i want with something i paid for..
If i sell a guitar for xxxxx and the buyer sells for yyyyy and gets it then thats his good fortune and mine really because i sold it for an amount i was happy with.
I totally make a conscious decision to take big hits now and again, i could hold out for the "right" price, but you know i hate guitars sitting doing nothing, i have had some cracking deals in my time and certainly dont mind being on the "wrong" end of a few.
I think if someone comes on here purely to exploit the classifieds then we should take issue with that certainly...but its good to have "churn" keeps the wheels in motion.
I think the key is 'transparency' - it's a good deal when both parties end up being happy and, because we're enthusiasts, many of us would like to think that a deal's been done in good faith.
The argument seems to fall into two camps - 1) the folks that think 'it's none of your business what the buyer does with it' and 2) the folks that think that being honest is the right thing to do.
I think it's 1) and 2) personally.
I don't sell that much stuff (only when I need to fund something else) to get involved in being a serious seller, but I've had too many scam attempts, and heard of too many scam attempts when accepting PayPal or posting (as Lee and I were discussing) to be bothered with it.
(That's a bit of hyperbole, but gets the gist of it).
I don't think any of us regularly on here are motivated by money particularly, but none of us want to feel like we've been manipulated and made to look a fool, particularly if that involves being nice to someone. And the fear of that makes people more suspicious than they really ought to be.
I've been a terrible mark for sob-story conmen on the street in the past - not for very large amounts of money, but the feeling of being manipulated and tricked is terrible, and makes you afraid of what they could have taken you for. Consequently I'm very unlikely to not be an arsehole to someone who approaches me for help nowadays. It's not a justification - I'm still an arsehole - but has become an instinctive defence mechanism.