It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Which seems proper to me.
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/87380/article-50-no-10-says-high-court-says-yes/p1
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
We have a prime minister saying one thing to Goldman Sachs' bankers and another to the public, a government making promises to Nissan that it isn't making to British business, and every cabinet member pushing for Brexit seems to have an entirely different plan and vision to their colleagues.
That seems like exactly the kind of situation where the government needs to get it's act together and come up with a plan that is sufficiently well thought out that it can persuade a majority of MPs to accept it. I doubt the current half-baked confusion would persuade many. The referendum gave a clear result, but not a license to rush ahead like half-witted idiots with muddled messages and no clear idea. How can scrutiny to make sure that our goals for our future relationship with the EU are clearly established, communicated to the public and acceptable to our democratically elected parliament be a bad thing?
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
Keeping her plan to herself seems much more like not having a plan... and given our economy hinges on it we might like to know that our best interests are protected
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
And there's a difference between an outline of desired outcomes to the specifics and minutia... currently no plan of any sort is in evidence only "we'll get the best deal we can" well if we're offered a shit sandwich and nothing else it would still be the best deal we got... still not a good deal though.
It should be for parliament to decide what is a good deal... not one person who won't even say what she thinks a good deal looks like
Feedback
To be honest, once article 50 is triggered we leave after 2 years anyway in a "hard" Brexit. If Parliament blocks triggering it then May will call an election at which the Tories will massively increase their majority based on current polls and push it through anyway.
Having the PM keep her cards close to her chest seems like the strongest position for the benefit of the nation. having a bunch of talkers puff up their self esteem and make political points for their respective constituents cannot be justified as good for the country if we are to move forward with the nations 'choice'.
But she won't get to trigger Article 50 as MPs shout at each other and parts of the press yell racist at anyone who wants to stop free movement. The BBC has just gone into pro EU anti-Tory overdrive .. what's it going to be like trying to get to trigger A50. I'd say impossible.
Let May go and get a deal and then MPs can vote on it or bin Brexit.
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
Parliament will probably block the triggering of A50. Everyone in the government will look stupid. Everyone will continue all this childish in-fighting and name-calling for several more years.
I'm just glad the pound's up.
Couldn't run a p'up in a brewery, and I don't just meant the Tories ...
Feedback