It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Ebay mark7777_1
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
https://youtu.be/cphNpqKpKc4
Looks like classic manipulator behaviour to me, he’s just moving on having gotten more trouble than expected.
And no proof of postage still? Very strange.
I suspect he's just sore at you having got the refund and trying to rattle you out of spite. Also he'd prefer this story to disappear, and his only way to make that happen is to try and worry you.
how many more folk is he going to fuck over?
They won’t look for that information if you don’t tell them.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
If someone is really instructing a solicitor they won't go telling the person in the first place.
The phrase 'you'll be hearing from my solicitor' is without doubt one of the most empty threats I've ever heard.
It puts me in mind of a 'Bond Villain' who reveals all of his secret plans before leaving Bond to die, unattended, in a slow and bizarre manner.
"Done gigs for this guy and I can confirm he is a con man. He will lie about anything. He once lied about his wife having cancer (she didn't) to get out of paying a mate of mine so I wouldn't believe the excuse about having Covid"
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
Crikey - how's he going to fiddle that?
BUT first make sure they are from a real solicitor and he's not making stuff up. It's a criminal offence to pretend to be a solicitor.
And then ask, very politely, if the solicitor is aware of the past convictions, and that there is likely to be a far larger counter claim for libel following the allegations of sexual offences that are not true.
Very polite. Nothing remotely argumentative. Just providing information.
That alone would cause 99% of solicitors to re-visit their assessment of the merits of representing him in such a matter.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
but, if someone said something like “Mick Mason is a convicted fraudster and has a micro penis so small it’s laughable” that could be considered defamation as the size of his micro penis might not actually be funny...
so the statement “Mick Mason has a micro penis so small it’s laughable” may only be partly true...
however... if the micro penis’d Mick Mason would like to sue for defamation in this instance, I believe he would have to prove that the statement “Mick Mason has a micro penis” is indeed not true... the statement may have to be corrected to something like “Mick Mason has a small Willy” rather than “Mick Mason has a micro penis”... I’m guessing the courts would want to see proof either way tho’
I may have it all wrong tho’...
is the statement “Mick Mason has a micro penis” defamation? please discuss...
It's not Jason Orange, is it?