It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
People complaining about lack of facts in this thread. Well, I think this thread and the attitude on the forum has been great. Rather than silly name calling people have tried to put forward reasoned arguments. I'm not seeing that so much on my social media
Offset "(Emp) - a little heavy on the hyperbole."
Likewise with movement. I think it unlikely we'd suddenly need visa's to travel into Europe, but working on the continent would most likely become more problematic. What happens to the UK nationals living and working on the continent? I've not seen anything specific about that so we don't know as far as I'm aware. If I've missed it I'd be happy for any links.
Leave have stated that EU nationals currently here will be granted Indefinite Leave to Remain which means that not only can they stay, but any children they have after that are automatically British Citizens, the current Treaty Rights agreement requires 5 years continuous residence and employment for the same privilege. Not sure I see that as progress.
I'm currently about 60% v's40% Remain v's Leave. I can see merits for both sides but staying in seems to be edging it for me at the mo'.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Going off last years election disaster with polling way off I don't think it will be as close they're making it out to be.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Because it is not THEM offering US a trade deal. It is not a customer supplier relationship - seems the majority of Remain voters are completely ignorant of what a trade agreement it. Almost every EU company who does business with UK companies will lobby their governments to keep the trade agreement with the UK as is, in effect. Change the title of any legal docs but effectively keep it the same.
Care to explain it in layman's terms as to what actually goes on?
I'm saying that it's unlikely we'll be able to have our cake and eat it, leave but keep all the good bits of the EU we do like and ditch the bits we don't. Of course trade will still happen, but at a price. I doubt the rest of the EU will just give us the best deal for us, rather offer us the best deal for them. Why wouldn't they?
Brexit campaigners would have you believe that the French and Germans and the other dominant voices in the EU hate us and don't have the UK's interests at heart but that these same countries will just turn round and offer us any deal we want on any terms we want if we vote to leave.They think we get a bad deal now, why they think we'll get better ones when we're not in the club doesn't really make sense.
Erm, this is your OPINION and is not factually based at all. Therefore it is nothing more than fear mongering.
It's no secret that Germany's GDP boomed in early Spring and imports and sales for German cars in the UK market peaked at their highest level ever in April.
I really think it's because you don't all want to drive Japanese or Korean or Indian cars and want your service contract on your Mercs fulfilled, that is the real reason you are all voting in isn't it.
[Quote] Erm, this is your OPINION and is not factually based at all. Therefore it is nothing more than fear mongering.
It's no secret that Germany's GDP boomed in early Spring and imports and sales for German cars in the UK market peaked at their highest level ever in April.
I really think it's because you don't all want to drive Japanese or Korean or Indian cars and want your service contract on your Mercs fulfilled, that is the real reason you are all voting in isn't it. [/quote]
I don't drive a cara) Unlike Customer-Supplier relationships, trade between two countries is always bi-directional.
EU companies will sell goods and services to the UK companies and customers.
UK companies will sell goods and services to EU companies and customers.
So if, for example, the trade agreement is 'bad for sellers' then its bad for sellers on both sides.
b) Two main approaches to international trade.
Protectionism is the targeted application of limits on what can be imported, quotas of the maximum number that can be imported, or tariffs on what is imported so the price is hiked up by a tax to dissuade buyers.
Free trade was invented by Britain and is what we have in the EU - no limits, quotas or tariffs. Nothing to hinder sellers or buyers in 'doing business'. Free trade is increasingly sought because the predominant world political view is that trade is good.
A trade agreement can be a mix of the two approaches, varied by the categories of goods and services. For example, it could agree free trade on all engineered and manufactured products that contain steel but place a tariff on raw steel in an attempt to help our own steelworks. So the price of foreign steel would hiked by the tariff, making Port Talbot steel more competitive. German car manufacturers would be happy but German specialist steel makers might not be.
So this is where the concept of 'negotiating a trade agreement' begins. Amongst all categories of goods and services, there will be some where there is a political will to have free trade or apply protectionism.
But for simplicity lets go back to my steel example. Would Merkel agree to it? German car manufacturers will lobby her to agree it - free trade on their car sales is precisely what they want. German specialist steel makers will lobby her to disagree - they won't want tariffs. Merkel might look at the values of their exports and see that German car sales are a billion a month while German steel sales are only a tenth of that. So she might choose to agree the deal. Note that the pressure on Merkel is from fellow Germans, not us!
Quite likely she would find other goods and services where she could put a tariff on what the UK sold to Germany. So she might suggest an import tariff on say Rolls Royces sold in Germany. This would please German car makers and get the UK to rethink the steel tariff.
This used to be called Trade Wars when these tariffs were unilaterally introduced by either side on a tit-for-tat basis.
But would the UK stick to the steel tariff to aid Port Talbot? Rolls Royce would lobby the UK government to get the tariff removed from their car sales in Germany. So maybe we'd drop the steel tariff and Merkel would drop the Rolls Royce tariff.
Now repeat the above across ALL categories of goods and services and you start to see that such negotiations can take many years! But trade happens every day and cannot stop - its how money gets into company bank accounts to pay wages. How much easier to keep 99% the same as now? Very much easier and what almost all EU companies will lobby for. Again, the pressure on the EU is from within, not us!
So this grossly simplified and miniaturised worked example hopefully gives you some idea of what 'negotiating a trade agreement' means. I hope you can also see that it is silly to think that the EU can penalise the UK through an adverse trade agreement.
So, in the event of a Leave vote, will we be negotiating a trade agreement with the EU as a single entity, or with individual member states?
Former sounds not so bad, latter sounds like a ball-ache.